Can someone sell a painting of a photo that I took?
I have a Facebook account and post pics of my daughter for friends and family only (that is our privacy setting on FB). My aunt showed her friend (an artist) a pic of my daughter and the friend painted a picture of her from the photo. Now the friend wants to charge us $350 to buy the painting or sell it to someone else. Can you tell me if she can do this? What are our rights to our daughters image? FYI: We took the photo with our personal camera.
Jenn on March 9, 2012
Since you took the photo, you own the copyright. So, if your aunt’s friend sells the picture to someone else, legally she should get your permission first. You could ask for a percentage of the sale price, charge her a flat fee, or even prohibit her from selling her copy of your picture.
- Law
- Copyright
- Copyright Questions
- Do buildings have copyright?
- What is editorial use?
- What is copyright infringement?
- Where is the public domain?
- Can I copy old family photos that are 65 years old?
- Can I use a photo off the Internet in a presentation?
- Can I use my newspaper photos in my portfolio?
- Can photos of my artwork be sold without my permission?
- Is it against the law to paint an old photograph that someone has taken?
- Do I have rights to photos I took for a college paper?
- Can I legally copy an old photo from an eBay ad?
- Can someone sell a painting of a photo that I took?
- Do I need permission to sell a photo of someone’s house?
- How do I prove that I took a disputed photo?
- Can similar shots of a landmark get copyright?
- Can a print store refuse to scan a portrait of me?
- I’m a model. If I hire a photographer, who gets the copyright?
- Who owns the copyright if the photographer died?
- Does copyright exist for proprietary RAW photos?
- Can I sell street photos without model releases?
- Can I copy proofs from a model shoot?
- Can I sell photos of famous public parks or landscapes?
- Do I need permission to sell photos of a famous building?
- Can I resell photos that I previously sold?
- Do I lose copyright if I enter online photo contests?
- Can I remove blemishes from a photo of me?
- Can a website use Facebook photos and make fun of them?
- Can a photographer rescind permission?
- Can I sell photos of paintings in a gallery?
- Can I use my photos in a portfolio if they’re on Facebook?
- Can I use product photos in my portfolio?
- Do website rippers infringe copyright?
- Can a yearbook publisher use my Facebook photos?
- Are particular old photos in the public domain?
- What if a photographer complains about unauthorized use?
- How do I convince a print store that I took some photos?
- Do I own copyright in a drawing of a photo?
- If I paid a photographer, who owns the copyright?
- Can I sell products using images from the Internet?
- Can I stop my wedding photographer from using my photos?
- Do I get copyright if I infringed someone’s rights?
- Do I need permission to sell a photo of a branded car?
- Can a school claim copyright for photos I took there?
- Can I copyright a 3D picture?
- How do I copyright my pictures?
- Can I publish photos of tattoos without permission?
- Am I infringing on copyright if I sell a montage using a picture of a statue?
- Can a photo of my family be sold without my permission?
- Can I sell photos of toys at a store?
- Can I stop a website using my Facebook photos?
- Can I sell photos that I find on a discarded computer?
- Can I copyright or trademark my building?
- Do I need permission to use photos of houses?
- If a client breaks a contract, can I revoke photo use?
- Can I copyright a photo with effects from an iPhone app?
- Can I paint and sell a photo from Google?
- Can I use a photo of a celebrity without their permission?
- Can I display on the Internet my photos of paintings made before 1800?
- Can I use thumbnail photos of storefronts in an online directory?
- Do we need permission from photographers to use their photos of our church?
- How do I get permission to use somebody else’s work?
- How can I find out who owns a copyright?
- Am I allowed to take photos of accidents to use as evidence?
- How can I obtain copies of someone else’s work and/or registration certificate?
- How much of someone else’s work can I use without getting permission?
- Can I photograph a painting by a dead painter for private display?
- How much do I have to change in order to claim copyright in someone else’s work?
- Somebody infringed my copyright. What can I do?
- Does the law stop us from selling photos of covered bridges in state parks?
- Could I be sued for using somebody else’s work? How about quotes or samples?
- Do you have a list of songs or movies in the public domain?
- Do I need a license in California to sell personally or online?
- I saw an image on the Library of Congress website that I would like to use. Do I need to obtain permission?
- My local copying store will not make reproductions of old family photographs. What can I do?
- Can I use, on my website, photos that I took at my full-time job?
- Can I paint and sell a photo by a famous photographer that I found on the Web?
- As a model, can I sell photos that I appear in?
- To sell photos of a city, do I need a permit for commercial photography?
- What are the laws regarding using family photos of siblings on a website?
- How can I disable the right-click ‘save target as’ on images?
- If I photograph a document that is out of copyright, do I get a new copyright to that photograph?
- Can I make copies of my professionally-taken family portraits?
- Can I sell photos that I took at zoos and battlefields?
- Can I sell pictures of buildings that show a phone number and address?
- In an ad campaign, can I use a photo I found on a website if I can’t find who owns the photo?
- Can I copyright a photo if I did not take it and it is over a 100 years old?
- What is copyright?
- Does a model have rights over photos I took of her?
- What does copyright protect?
- When is my work protected?
- Do I have to register my copyright to be protected?
- I’ve heard about a poor man’s copyright. What is it?
- Is my copyright good in other countries?
- Can I copyright my website?
- Can I copyright my domain name?
- How do I protect my recipe?
- How do I copyright a name, title, slogan or logo?
- How do I protect my idea?
- Does my work have to be published to be protected?
- How do I protect my sighting of Elvis?
- Does copyright protect architecture?
- How long does a copyright last?
- Are copyrights transferable?
- Do I have to submit a form to transfer a copyright?
- Can I copyright a diary I found in my grandmother’s attic?
- What is a copyright notice? How do I put a copyright notice on my work?
- What is a work made for hire?
In ps_get_permalink but no post_id supplied, from ps_breadcrumbs at line 12421
Comments
Reply by Anonymous
January 11, 2016
I took a picture of my daughter dancing ballet. I ask my sister-in-law to paint a picture and she did. Turn out beautiful she said that will sell it to me and when she send it it wasn’t the original! It was a bad copy! What should I do? I’m very mad I think she sold it at a art exhibit!
Reply by Andrew Hudson, PhotoSecrets
January 12, 2016
Hi. That is a sad tale. Talk to your sister-in-law and see what the story is. If you are unhappy with what you received, you can return the picture and ask for your money back.
Reply by DeeDee
June 19, 2015
Hey,
I took a picture of a baby a while ago and decided to make a rather large painting of that photo. The painting turned out awesome and now the mother of that baby wants me to give the painting to her. I would be completely okay with giving her the painting if it wasn’t so large. It is around 4 feet by 5 feet. The painting took around four weeks to complete and the supplies necessary were definitely not cheap. I mentioned to her that I was planning on selling the painting and that if she wanted it, she would have to buy it from me. She is claiming that it is law that I need the model’s permission (the baby) to sell the painting. Is this true? Or does it not pertain to this situation because I painted a photograph that I took? I even changed some colors around as well.
Thanks!
Reply by Andrew Hudson, PhotoSecrets
January 6, 2016
Hi DeeDee,
There are two issues here: copyright and privacy.
Copyright: You own the painting, and the copyright in the painting, as you took the photo and painted the picture. So the painting is yours (not the mother’s) and you do not have to give it away for free. You can keep the painting for yourself, or sell the painting to the mother. For more information, see copyright.
Privacy: Generally, the mother “owns” the likeness of the baby. This is state law (in the U.S.) so it depends upon the law in your state. This is usually considered “privacy” (or “publicity”) law. Some states do not have such laws, so it may be that the mother has no rights to the image of her baby. Since laws vary by jurisdiction, photographers in these situations typically present a “model release” to the model (or mother in this case) which, once signed, gives the photographer whatever permission is specified in the release. For more information, see privacy and model release.
It seems from your question that no model release was signed, which is a problem if selling the painting. You probably have permission to OWN the photo, and PAINT the photo (since the mother arguably gave tacit permission for the original photograph to be taken), but you may not have permission to SELL the painting, since that would be making money from the child’s likeness. As mentioned, this is state law so the mother would need to consult a local lawyer to see what, if any, recourse she has.
You could make an arrangement with the mother, say split the revenue (minus your paint/canvas costs). Otherwise, you should consult a local lawyer if you want to sell the photo.
Note that I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.
Reply by Anonymous
May 2, 2015
Changing a photo into a painting or drawing constitutes a transformative change and is not a copyright violation. It is however, artistic plagiarism if they do not give you credit for your photo as the resource. That’s not illegal, but it’s unethical. While not a crime, there is the potential for a civil lawsuit if you can prove that the new work does you harm by devaluing your work in some way. If they give you credit for the work, there is nothing you can do accept the credit and take solace in the fact that someone likes your work enough to duplicate it.
Now if someone photographs your photo, or copies it electronically without any attempt to change it, that is illegal and can result in both criminal and civil action. In that case, go after them, and go hard!
I am a working artist who specializes in turning photography and movie stills into paintings and drawings. I have done a lot of research into this issue on my own and consulted a copyright attorney — for obvious reasons.
Perhaps this can help.
http://www.teachingcopyright.org/handout/fair-use-faq
Reply by Andrew Hudson, PhotoSecrets
May 19, 2015
PHOTO TO PAINTING
Legally, painting a photo (with no change) is a copyright violation. This is called a “derivative work”. Under U.S copyright law only “the owner of copyright ... has the exclusive rights to ... reproduce the copyrighted work in copies [and] to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work” (17 U.S. Code § 106).
A “transformative” change is a fair-use exception that may apply only when the original image has been altered “with new expression, meaning, or message”. The amount of alteration required can only be determined by a judge at trial.
In the U.S., there is no requirement for giving credit (unless as part of a license) so that would not likely be the basis of a successful lawsuit. However, as mentioned above, simply “changing a photo into a painting” can be the basis of a civil copyright lawsuit, regardless of “if they give you credit for the work” or not.
Note that “turning photography and movie stills into paintings and drawings” is illegal copyright violation if (a) the original work is under copyright protection; (b) you do not have written permission; and (c) your image is not sufficiently different in “expression, meaning, or message”. Note that “transformative” is an affirmative defense, meaning that you would have to prove this at trial, and going to trial can cost big bucks. So be careful!